Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
Assess morningness and eveningness. Questions are framed in a preferential manner, where the respondent is asked to indicate when, for example, he/she would prefer to wake up or start sleep, rather than when he/she actually does.
Author / Source: Tony Ho, MSW, RSW
Original study in student population (18-32 years). Validated with oral temperature curves. Morning types had a significantly earlier peak time in the circadian peak than Evening types and tended to have a higher daytime temperature and lower post peak temperature.
- 16-30 - "definite evening"
- 31-41 - "moderate evening"
- 42-58 - "intermediate"
- 59-69 - "moderate morning"
- 70-86 - "definite morning"
When re-examined, original criteria of Horne and Ostberg (1976) studies showed different validity in different populations. In a validation study in a sample of middle-aged workers- (non-students): evening types were considered as scoring under 53 and morning types above 64, thus giving 28.1% morning type, 51.7% neither type and 20.2% evening type.
In 14 studies that used the MEQ in individuals without a diagnosis of circadian rhythm disorder and used objective circadian phase marker testing (e.g., core body temperature, DLMO), all studies found that subjects with a later circadian phase generally scored lower on the MEQ. Pearson’s correlation coefficients ranged widely from -0.353 to -0.760 in studies, possibly due to differences in study populations and study conditions.
- [1]Horne JA, Östberg O. (1976).: "A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms". Int J Chronobiol 4 (2): 97–110.
- [2]Taillard J, et al. (2004).: "Validation of Horne and Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire in a Middle-Aged Population of French Workers".Journal of Biological Rhythms 19 (1): 76–86.
- [3]Paine SJ, Gander PH, Travier N.(2006): The Epidemiology of Morningness/Eveningness: Influence of Age, Gender, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Factors in Adults (30-49 Years).J Biol Rhythms 21: 68-76.
- [4]Sack R, et al. (2007): Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorders: Part I, Basic Principles, Shift Work and Jet Lag Disorders.Sleep 30(11): 1460-1483.
- [5]Cavallera GM, Boari G. (2015): Validation of the Italian Version of the Morningness-EveningnessQuestionnaire for Adolescents by A. Lancry and Th. Arbault.Med Sci Monit 21: 2685-93.
- [6]Zacharia T, et al. (2014): Development and standardization of Morningess-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) in the Indian language Kannada.Int Tinnitus J 19(1): 36-40.
- [7]Lee JH, et al. (2014): Reliability and valididty of the Korean version of Morningess-Eveningness Questionnaire in adults aged 20-39 years.Chronobiol Int 31(4): 479-86.
- [8]Diaz-Morales JF , et al. (2007): Validity of the Morningess-Eveningness Scale for Children among Spanish adolescents.Chronobiol Int. 24(3): 435-47.
Results
Real-time automated computation
Original study in student population (18-32 years). Validated with oral temperature curves. Morning types had a significantly earlier peak time in the circadian peak than Evening types and tended to have a higher daytime temperature and lower post peak temperature.
- 16-30 - "definite evening"
- 31-41 - "moderate evening"
- 42-58 - "intermediate"
- 59-69 - "moderate morning"
- 70-86 - "definite morning"
When re-examined, original criteria of Horne and Ostberg (1976) studies showed different validity in different populations. In a validation study in a sample of middle-aged workers- (non-students): evening types were considered as scoring under 53 and morning types above 64, thus giving 28.1% morning type, 51.7% neither type and 20.2% evening type.
In 14 studies that used the MEQ in individuals without a diagnosis of circadian rhythm disorder and used objective circadian phase marker testing (e.g., core body temperature, DLMO), all studies found that subjects with a later circadian phase generally scored lower on the MEQ. Pearson’s correlation coefficients ranged widely from -0.353 to -0.760 in studies, possibly due to differences in study populations and study conditions.
- [1]Horne JA, Östberg O. (1976).: "A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms". Int J Chronobiol 4 (2): 97–110.
- [2]Taillard J, et al. (2004).: "Validation of Horne and Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire in a Middle-Aged Population of French Workers".Journal of Biological Rhythms 19 (1): 76–86.
- [3]Paine SJ, Gander PH, Travier N.(2006): The Epidemiology of Morningness/Eveningness: Influence of Age, Gender, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Factors in Adults (30-49 Years).J Biol Rhythms 21: 68-76.
- [4]Sack R, et al. (2007): Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorders: Part I, Basic Principles, Shift Work and Jet Lag Disorders.Sleep 30(11): 1460-1483.
- [5]Cavallera GM, Boari G. (2015): Validation of the Italian Version of the Morningness-EveningnessQuestionnaire for Adolescents by A. Lancry and Th. Arbault.Med Sci Monit 21: 2685-93.
- [6]Zacharia T, et al. (2014): Development and standardization of Morningess-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) in the Indian language Kannada.Int Tinnitus J 19(1): 36-40.
- [7]Lee JH, et al. (2014): Reliability and valididty of the Korean version of Morningess-Eveningness Questionnaire in adults aged 20-39 years.Chronobiol Int 31(4): 479-86.
- [8]Diaz-Morales JF , et al. (2007): Validity of the Morningess-Eveningness Scale for Children among Spanish adolescents.Chronobiol Int. 24(3): 435-47.